Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Broccoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Broccoli

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:1E / WP:TOOSOON / WP:NOTNEWS. One source is from yesterday and the rest from today, which does not yet indicate lasting notability. The "part of a group of climate protesters who bared their buttocks in the House of Commons that April" is unsourced. Lopifalko (talk) 18:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 18:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article is the very definition of a not news violation. We lack anything other than a quick coverage of a news event.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – There has been regular coverage of him since he became known, as shown in the number of independent sources he lends his name to. He's also gained sufficient attention on different fronts, not just a single news story, for example through his participation in an anti-Brexit march in London. Andysmith248 (talk) 13:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andysmith248: What the article says is that he became known on 13 October 2019 for Extinction Rebellion activities, and related to that he did a TV interview on 16 October 2019; then the "different front" is that he attended an anti-Brexit march on 19 October 2019. -Lopifalko (talk) 10:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:30, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand. Meets the citation and notability guidelines.WikiAviator (talk) 06:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without objection to Userfying or recreating down the road if coverage continues - Certainly too soon. No indication of lasting significance. That the coverage since this was nominated has been largely negative/critical, highlights the WP:BLP concerns with WP:BLP/WP:1E. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Nom of WP:NOTNEWS, WP:TOOSOON, and Wikipedia:1E as well as the mentioned BLP concerns. Add WP:RECENTISM (dates of Oct 16-21, 2019) and that it is clearly a pseudo biography gives any one of six reasons for for not having stand alone status. The creator is not new to Wikipedia so one would think know how to request userfication. Then again, it would seem creating an article such as this would be considered something from a newer editor unfamiliar with policies and guidelines, but what do I know?

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON, WP:NOTNEWS.Strandvue (talk) 14:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.