Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Mijanur Rahaman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Mijanur Rahaman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 17:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: the sole author, User:Rajib2209, appears to be a WP:SPA focusing on this subject. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Please help me. How can i submit my profile Rajib2209 (talk) 17:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  
  @Ari T. Benchaim Hey, Please tell me in details what can i do now? Rajib2209 (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  In general, you really should not. If you're notable, you'll have your article soon enough. If not... this is an encyclopedia, not a social network. You don't 'submit your profile'. Please also read WP:AUTO. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NOTRESUME. Even a cursory look at the sources shows that there are no independent reliable sources discussing the subject. In fact, virtually all the sources are actually articles written by the subject.Slywriter (talk) 22:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can furnish references to reliable, independent published sources that provide significant coverage of this person. Things that he wrote are of no value in establishing notability. Calling the subject a "famous personality" in Wikipedia's voice is a giant red flag, and a glaring violation of the Neutral point of view, a core content policy. Cullen328 (talk) 03:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an attempted autobiography (above note by creator calling it a 'profile'). Separate issue is that Rahaman claims to be the photographer of the photo of himself. David notMD (talk) 07:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.