Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumtaz Mustafa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mumtaz Mustafa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Just brief mentions, lacks significant coverage to meet WP:GNG criteria. HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)~~ Blocked sock[reply]

Delete per nom. Looks like we're cleaning up non-notable members of the Punjab Bar Council today. MNewnham (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Pakistan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lacks significant coverage. 41.99.221.13 (talk) 20:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
keep: He is a prominent lawyer leader since long and he is now elected member of National Assembly of Pakistan in february 2024. see https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=12_02_2024_002_005 175.107.24.65 (talk) 06:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Not notable. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN as an MP. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One newspaper article in Urdu language has already been translated into English. Has 4 references from major newspapers of Pakistan, they all seem to work now. In my view, meets WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG...Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ridiculous nomination. Meets WP:NPOL as a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan: Politicians ... who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. Central and Adams (talk) 03:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree to keep, since after nomination he was elected as new MP on 2024 elections, we can now keep the article, attest update on the infobox is required. CSMention269 (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In fact he was elected before the nomination. Central and Adams (talk) 01:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Liz: asked to revert my closure, have done so. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 01:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satisfies WP:NPOL, member of national parliament, overwhelming community consesus that presumed notability applies. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 01:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Goldsztajn. 103.65.140.93 (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep MNA.
Panam2014 (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.