Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim society №3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is a consensus that sources are avaiable for use, even if they will be predominently in Rissian. (non-admin closure) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim society №3

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability asserted, no sources found. A7 declined for no reason Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 16:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 16:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 16:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there are some English sources, e.g. [1], and quite a bit of Russian language sources in the Russian wiki page. A7 should've been declined - there is a definite assertion of significance (a few hundred terror victims).Icewhiz (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 02:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article lists two external links that provide significant coverage of the subject:
- Конец «общества № 3» // Время новостей, 27 сентября 2002 (Vremya)
- Карачаево-Черкесcкий джамаат // Агентура. Ру (Agentura.Ru)
There are more sources and content on the Russian Wikipedia page about the subject at ru:Карачаевский джамаат.
Cunard (talk) 06:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cunard: You seem to have confused the AFD for the article. IF you find sources, put them in the article, not in the AFD. Try again. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@TenPoundHammer: Cunard said The article lists two external links. Try again. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The external links and Russian-language sources appear to be more than adequate. Joefromrandb (talk) 06:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Russian topic is natural most sources will be in Russian and the sources given above will prove notability given how more developed the article is on ru-wp.–Ammarpad (talk) 16:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.