Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyDirectives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MyDirectives

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article with a very promotional tone made worse by IP edits in April 2020.

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9] are passing mentions.

I have doubts that [10] and [11] are unbiased articles. [12] is an entry in a top 100. So I question if this company was ever notable to begin with. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete yikes. WP:TNT applies here. The page we're hosting now is just an advertisement, and should be removed. If the topic is notable (in a quick web search, all the sources I'm seeing look promotional), someone should start a new article from scratch. Ajpolino (talk) 20:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree that, even if notable, WP:TNT applies, and I don't find anything notable. -- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 21:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even leaving aside the TNT angle (which I agree with), the criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. So, on top of TNT, even with "cleanup" to reduce the promotional tone, topic still fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.