Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyDraw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MyDraw

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet software notability guidelines. Couldn't find multiple reliable third-party sources on the topic -- it's mostly user-submitted reviews or brief mentions. Citing (talk) 17:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Citing (talk) 17:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources do not establish notability, just the usual indiscriminate download portals. MrOllie (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE per nomination - no proof of notability. A bit of googling around also fails to establish its notability. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep I was able to find a product review by Venturebeat, which is considered a reliable source. It has also received coverage from a Polish news source and is the subject of this research study. The software has also been included in several manuals: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. This passes WP:NSOFT. Heartmusic678 (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC) I change my vote to Delete Heartmusic678 (talk) 11:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The venture beat review is tagged 'sponsored deals', that is a paid advertisement. Your 'manuals' are just search results that include the word 'MyDraw' in source code and the like and are not related to the topic of this article. I can't read the Polish or the Chinese source, but I'm not optimistic based on the other stuff you have linked here. MrOllie (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.