Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Brother Henry
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- My Brother Henry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Written in uncyclopedic way. Is this a book? Hard to tell. No assertion of notability [1] DFS454 (talk) 10:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete purely because there's no assertion of notability. (The nominator's other remarks are true, but they're grounds for editing, not deletion.)--S Marshall Talk/Cont 11:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's a short story/essay in J.M. Barrie's My Lady Nicotine (see Project Gutenberg). Unfortunately, the larger work this is in has no article or I'd have redirected or merged in a jiffy. I think the subject qualifies under the criterion that some artists are so notable that their works are inherently notable. I wouldn't hesitate to put Barrie in the same company as Dickens and Kipling to name just a few. The article is merely a rehash of the plot and not an encyclopedic article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't know if the short story is worth an article, but this isn't it - no sources, reads like a personal essay or original research. JohnCD (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 19:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't think it meets the "author is so famous; all his work should be covered"-criterion? - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It might fit that criteria, but there is no info about what WP:BK means by a historically significant author so I always ignore that criteria. Schuym1 (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.