Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Little Pony Online

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upcoming potentially notable unofficial mmorpg. Not notable yet. Mythpage88 (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a crystal ball exercise. I really do not want to contemplate a MMORPG consisting of tens of thousands of those MLP whackers... Carrite (talk) 03:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unlikely crystal ballery. 3D community-made MMORPGs are rare as hen's teeth anyway for obvious reasons, and an MMORPG made from someone else's unlicensed intellectual property? Come on. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This has the potential to become notable, but at this point it hasn't been released yet and as such, doesn't pass WP:CRYSTAL. There's a bit of coverage, but not enough and not in-depth enough to be the amount needed to warrant an article at this time. This would absolutely be worth mentioning on the main MLP:FIM article under the fandom. I'd also like to add that the fandom has started to reach the point that it might be worth creating a branch off article about it, if someone more savvy than I would like to do so. (I'm just a casual fan and probably wouldn't be the best editor for this. I know that MLP AfDs are usually often read, so I'm mentioning it here in case anyone is interested.) This article also might be worth userfying if someone is interested in doing so.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:42, 30 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:N and the sub-par citations do not help. User:SweetieBelleMLP 17:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's currently not notable, and honestly I doubt it ever will be. Wagner ^u t c 20:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete as WP:CRYSTAL mostly. While the few sources could contribute to GNG, their coverage is minimal at best and was only prompted by the brony community. There's no critical reception and without it real-world significance cannot be established proper. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:13, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.