Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. Gopalakrishnan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- N. Gopalakrishnan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Where to start? Firstly, it's difficult to find any information about this person because we don't know his full name, and there are a number of possibly-notable Gopalakrishnans whose first names start with "N." If it matters, WorldCat seems to think that it's "Narayanan."[1]
What I have found, though, is a lack of significant coverage of him outside of promotional pieces.[2] The bio details I thought would be easy to verify weren't; for instance, there's no mention of him working at/for the University of Alberta outside of his widely-spread copy/pasted peacock bio.
The article says he has "60 books to his credit," but WorldCat only knows about nineteen,[1] and all of those are self-published, i.e., they don't count towards his notability (note: I don't think he wrote Mental Health and You,[3] as there would have been a thirteen year gap between that and his next book; also, it's only 93 pages and no libraries appear to have it in their collection).
So far as his scientific career goes:
- The article says he has "50 scientific research papers in national and international scientific journals." Google scholar shows 73 articles by "N Gopalakrishnan" published between 1973-2001,[4] but it's pretty clear that they weren't all written by the same person. I'm guessing that his are the ones about agriculture and food chemistry, which means that his highest-ranked article has 33 citations.
- The article claims that he has seven patents, but Google can't find any of them.[5]
- I've found no sign of his "6 awards for scientific research, 9 science popularization awards from India and abroad," or "two fellowships."
All in all: I don't see how he meets WP:PROF or WP:GNG (and the WP:SPAs working on this article haven't helped it any). Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of evidence of notability so far produced. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- References
- ^ a b Works by or about N. Gopalakrishnan in libraries (WorldCat catalog)
- ^ Sunder, Rema (August 2010). "Unravelling the Science Behind Spirituality" (PDF). The Malayali Wings. pp. 4–5.
- ^ Gopalakrishnan, N. (1986). Mental Health and You. India Book House. OCLC 657995890.
- ^ Google Scholar
- ^ Google patent search
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 18:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- per well-researched and well-argued statements by the nominator. Not a perfect case of non-notability, but still significantly below the standard cut-off. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent evidence of notability beyond a few puff pieces. Famousdog (c) 13:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.