Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFS-Ganesha(a Network File System user-level server)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- NFS-Ganesha(a Network File System user-level server) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to advertise, but there may be some salvageable material on the page. There are no sources stated on the page at the moment, and a Google search brings up the project's SourceForge page. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 22:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an active opensource project with source forge(code base) and active community and mailing list, nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net and github (https://github.com/phdeniel/nfs-ganesha). Please let us know what else we need to give/offer to take it off of delete list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.63 (talk)
- Reply - Significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish that it meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. -- Whpq (talk) 20:06, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here's a link to the 2007 paper from USENIX. I'm afraid I can't spare time to work on the page per se. http://www.usenix.org/events/fast07/wips/slides/deniel.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.103.253 (talk)
- Reply - A paper presented by the author of the software is not an independent source as needed to establish incvlusion. -- Whpq (talk) 20:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I added a citation to the paper and to the list of open source projects on CEA's website (which includes NFS-Ganesha). Though it sounds like these do not meet requirements. I also included a citation to a presentation on NFS-Ganesha (hosted on youtube). The presenter is not the founder of NFS-Ganesha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.42.208.185 (talk) 21:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 06:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found zero significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 17:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 06:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.