Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NNPP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NNPP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be a notable term. Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions 16:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete basically it's a neologism (WP:NEO) and perhaps a dictionary definition (WP:NOTDICT). Barring the single source given, which very probably was where the term was invented, there seems to be hardly anything but programmers' blogs on the topic, so Notability not established. The concept that poor programmers slow projects down ain't exactly news (how old is Tom DeMarco now?) either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Wiktionary:NNPP per Chiswick Chap's rationale and coverage in the wild. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 20:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of wp:notability. No indication of existence of the term outside of the writing of the author who created the term. North8000 (talk) 22:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.