Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NRL Rugby League 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 03:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- NRL Rugby League 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unreferenced article on non notable video game WuhWuzDat 14:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The article can easily be referenced, what defines if it's a notable videogame? Chopper Dave (talk) 18:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge this and Rugby League 2 World Cup Edition to NRL Rugby League - I found one or two reviews for the latter two, but not this version, so I suggest merging them all into one article. Marasmusine (talk) 10:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mergeto Rugby League (video game).--Sloane (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Keep Enough sources have been found.--Sloane (talk) 13:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Keep and add references. If the game is notable then I don't see why the sequel isn't. Mattlore (talk) 06:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Notability isn't inherited.--Sloane (talk) 02:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well whats notable and whats not when it comes to video games? I think its odd that RL1 and RL3 would have pages while RL2 is deemed unnotable? There seem to be plenty of reviews on the game out there,[1][2][3] so what more do you need? The answer to the original question "what defines if it's a notable videogame" by Chopper Dave hasn't yet been answered. Mattlore (talk) 04:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I answered Dave's question on the 22 March (but oops, I forgot to sign it). Marasmusine (talk) 11:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you answer it on this page please? What defines a notable video game? Mattlore (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, we normally use WP:GNG, and for videogames this is normally reviews in reliable sources, which you have adequately demonstrated. Marasmusine (talk) 11:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, it just seems to be a little frustrating, as when compared to Athletes it is a lot more grey rather than black and white. Mattlore (talk) 05:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, we normally use WP:GNG, and for videogames this is normally reviews in reliable sources, which you have adequately demonstrated. Marasmusine (talk) 11:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you answer it on this page please? What defines a notable video game? Mattlore (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I answered Dave's question on the 22 March (but oops, I forgot to sign it). Marasmusine (talk) 11:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well whats notable and whats not when it comes to video games? I think its odd that RL1 and RL3 would have pages while RL2 is deemed unnotable? There seem to be plenty of reviews on the game out there,[1][2][3] so what more do you need? The answer to the original question "what defines if it's a notable videogame" by Chopper Dave hasn't yet been answered. Mattlore (talk) 04:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Notability isn't inherited.--Sloane (talk) 02:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep See Mattlore's reasoning - I agree Kiwichix0r (talk) 08:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This game seems notable, there is a lot of stuff about it online. Also, Wuhwuzdat hasn't clearly justified his nomination so it's a bit difficult to engage in this discussion. LunarLander // talk // 23:47, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.