Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NV Residences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the list is created then anyone can create redirects at that point. Davewild (talk) 07:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NV Residences

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG: a completely ordinary multistory condo in Singapore with very routine real estate listings, was cited once in Straits Times (reprinted elsewhere) as an example of local market rents, won an obscure local award. Article has no reason to exist other than promotion.

I am also nominating the following related pages because they were created at the same time by the same self-declared COI editor (who probably "forgot" to declare COI here "probably in a hurry"), and have exactly the same sourcing problems:

— Brianhe (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Martin No 38 is listed as a World Architecture Festival category winner (Architectural Record). If there is an architecture-specific guideline analagous to WP:ANYBIO this may qualify it as notable. — Brianhe (talk) 21:24, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both No notability established for either.Pincrete (talk) 19:08, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to List of landmark sites in Singapore as I'm not finding much with my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) aside from one at Books. In a way, it's likely this wasn't a major event that would've attracted news attention unless it was provoked. SwisterTwister talk 17:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There is no such article and just these two entities aren't enouh to start a list article. — Brianhe (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.