Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namami Krsnasundaram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Namami Krsnasundaram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another self-published book by Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar (here writing as Shrii Shrii Anandamurti) that has failed to gain notability outside of Sarkar's Ananda Marga organization. The two citations to reliable sources are a brief quotation and an unannotated listing in a bibliography. No independent discussion of the book exists in the popular or scholarly press and there's no indication that any such discussion will be forthcoming. Recommend deletion.

Instead of several non-notable articles, the editors might want to create a Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar (bibliography) page where each of these books would be listed. Garamond Lethe 04:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: an article to improve (but not to delete) of an important indian author.--Anta An (talk) 08:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC) — Anta An (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete No evidence this meets our criteria for notability. A bibliography article would also be inappropriate. If anyone wanst this book kept they need to show notability - find some sources that meet our criteria at WP:RS and discuss the book in some depth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 15:35, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; notability problems. bobrayner (talk) 14:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I have been unable to locate conclusive evidence of notability per Wikipedia criteria.--Zananiri (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.