Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narayana Health

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 18:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Narayana Health

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. — Cirt (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 22:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While it is true that the article needs to be edited in order to correct the advertorial tone, the company itself meets WP:GNG. Multiple mainstream news reports mentions (more than passing mention) the company, as evidenced by google search, and also searching per WP:INDAFD. The article itself has several references. --Dwaipayan (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The notability of the hospital/company is clear from the news link. The article may be tagged for improvements. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although definitely requires massive revision. Chhandama (talk) 11:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Articles on Large hospital chains are a good way of handling the subject as an alternative to articles on individual hospitals. Hospitals tend to be technically individually notable, but without there being much to say except the basic statistics. They're a little like primary schools in this regard, and in the case of commercial chains, the best merged article is on the underlying company., DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.