Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Imeretinsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 02:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Imeretinsky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Certainly fails on NRV and GNG. Insufficient references exist to assert this article's notability. I can only find a single independent reference to Imeretinsky on GoogleBooks refering to her as a hotelier. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Princess royal by blood of the former-Kingdom of Imereti. Article can be expanded in the future. Thus keep. Jaqeli 15:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems extremely unlikely this article will ever be expanded in the future, it has been tagged for almost two years and seen virtually no additional content added since. Do you have an ISBN for the solitary reference? Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've added the ISBN. More sources can be added. @Kober: any thoughts? Jaqeli 12:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment. I don't think that the article is salvageable. Being a scion of the defunct royal house does not itself make the person notable if she is otherwise unknown. So, I would suggest merging the article with Wei Wu Wei. --Kober^Talk 12:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Gets zero in news and newspaper searches, and in books I can find one mention in a 1955 travel guide. [1] One possibility is that she is given a different name in some sources, but for that I wouldn't know where to begin. LaMona (talk) 04:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Just because it does not get many results in the net in English does not mean it is not important. She is of royal origin and article can be expanded as there are sources in Georgian. Jaqeli 12:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jaqeli, you need to present those sources here for us to see. And if there are no sources in English, but many in Georgian, then perhaps the best place for this article is in a different Wikipedia. Although the rules don't say that the sources have to be in English, a total lack of English sources strikes me as problematic. LaMona (talk) 13:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - article does not suggest that WP:ANYBIO criteria are met. "Royalty" does not appear to receive any special dispensation.--Rpclod (talk) 21:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Ideally Jaqeli can post these additional sources if possible. I'm not convinced that the subject is either notable or non-notable, the article makes claims of notability which sound plausible, but need additional sourcing support. That its been tagged for 2 years is of no moment, there are articles which have been tagged for 10 years which are no doubt notable.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable stub article for low-ranking purported royal. Quis separabit? 12:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.