Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Mental Health Anti-Stigma Campaign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Mental Health Anti-Stigma Campaign

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Doesnt seem to exist now. No details about the campaign itself, just about the problem. Rathfelder (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychiatry-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 23:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep As long as good sources can be added.TH1980 (talk) 02:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The topic of this article is a discontinued public service advertising campaign by a US government agency, from 10 years ago. See for example [1]. I don't think government public service advertising campaigns are generally notable, unless they are of exceptional/lasting cultural impact, and I don't think this one was. I think the underlying concept of mental illness stigma is notable, and it is unfortunate there is no article on it yet (although there is Social_stigma#People_with_mental_disorders) and also Mental_disorder#Stigma). But, the notability of the underlying concept doesn't automatically make a government advertising campaign against it notable. (@TH1980:, I'm not sure if your "Weak Keep" is about the campaign or the concept?) SJK (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no refs in the article, google returning nothing much, the campaign appears to have stopped and had no longevity. Szzuk (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.