Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen ul Haq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naveen ul Haq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cricketer who fails WP:NCRIC. Has not yet played a first-class/List A game, etc. U19 cricketers don't meet the notability threshold. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Fails NCRIC and does not otherwise show how it passes WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Agreed. DilMendis82 (talk) 14:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Blocked sock—UY Scuti ^Talk 14:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom as it fails WP:NCRIC.Black hole78 ^{talk | contrib} 17:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 02:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- yet another non notable cricketer. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.