Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Negatory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Transwikied to Wiktionary. (aeropagitica) 18:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Negatory

Contested prod, slang for "no". Delete or redirect to No. —EdGl 18:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Dicdef. Tevildo 18:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The word is certainly in usage, but wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang.--Anthony.bradbury 19:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Funny story. Neologism of an article.Obina 19:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wiktionary if it's not already there. It's not really a neologism, as it's been around for at least since CB was popular in the 1970s. --Dennisthe2 20:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki on the same conditions above, otherwise Delete --Wildnox (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to no. They're one in the same, so why not? Scepia 21:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki given that the supplied story is valid and appropriate for the Wiktionary entry. Redirecting to no seems problematic as that goes to NO and negative is a disambiguation page too. – ipso 04:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced and per WP:WINAD, transwiki if Wiktionary wants this. Sandstein 11:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.