Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Stott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Stott

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article as written does not satisfy WP:PROF. Additional searching did not reveal additional material that would satisfy this notability criteria. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 14:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 14:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see any evidence of subject meet WP:NPROF. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is basically a CV. Does not pass NPROF. --Kbabej (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citations appear to fall far short of WP:NPROF C1; no sign of other NPROF criteria, nor of books for WP:NAUTHOR, nor of GNG notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 21:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as others have already said. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.