Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelly Drell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nelly Drell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. The two current references are weak. I cannot find any reliable sources. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As far as I can tell, she has exhibited in Tallinn Art Hall and et:ArtDepoo galerii, but only in group shows. I'm not sure if she has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition. No solo exhibitions. Vexations (talk) 10:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep . Reliable sources: e-kunstisalong.ee, some sources saatchiart.com, artmajeur.com. Several solo exhibitions ('isikunäitused' in Estonian), see [1]. One reception about her solo exhibition sirp.ee--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
saatchiart.com is not a reliable source and not to be confused with the Saatchi Gallery. It hosts user-generated content and is thus neither independent nor reliable. Artmajeur is not an independent, reliable source either. Sirp looks like it might be usable. Vexations (talk) 10:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13_(talk) 22:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional BLP, lacks coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.