Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewPipe (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Having been relisted twice, I am skeptical that a third relist would have a meaningful difference. The keep that found that notability should be derived from a video by a youtuber was given no weight because it was not grounded in policy. GHITS is considered to be a poor argument by the community, so I did not find it persuasive. Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NewPipe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Product fails WP:NPRODUCT. Not only are the sources in the article primary or not reliable, but also there are no other sources that are significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources that could be found by searching on Google. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Newpipe is a relatively well known alternative for watching YouTube videos. One single person who hasn't heard of the tool or doesn't understand the reason for the need, seems seems like a poor reason to deem the work of 100s of devs over 7 years as, "Not Notable". Especially knowing some of the very arcane items (some with very little data) that WP lists.
How did I see this "deletion" page? Newpipe has been referenced multiple times over multiple years at ghacks.net (Most recently - https://www.ghacks.net/2022/10/21/google-is-increasing-the-price-of-youtube-premium-family-significantly/) and after all of the posts about it over the years, I wanted to learn more. 70.112.82.122 (talk) 06:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.