Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Stem Cell Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New York Stem Cell Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NCORP, WP:ADVERT. The article was created by the organization itself, and significantly edited by at least one single purpose account and main points are based on primary sources. Some of the sources not related to the page are not significant independent coverage, such as biography page of various researchers. Even if notability as an organization can be established per WP:NCORP, the whole thing would need to be rewritten to be encyclopedic WP:TNT without POV bias infused by the connected editors. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2007-05 ✗ deleted

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although some researchers associated with them might have gotten coverage in reliable sources, notability isn't inherited and I see nothing notable here about the actual organization itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamant1 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.