Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newshounds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Newshounds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every single source is primary. The only award won was Ursa Major, which was deleted via AFD twice as a non-notable award. The fact that it's on keenspot doesn't transfer to notability, neither does the synthesis-laden Controversy section. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 00:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At the moment there are no reliable secondary sources of some kind in the article which indicate notability. --Novil Ariandis (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No claim of notability, no significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Poorly sourced to blog "Controversy" section has WP:BLP issues concerning presumably living webcomic artist. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.