Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Longano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 04:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Longano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable individual, despite being named in a few trade publications. Music Mogul is a defunct company that never launched and now links to a dead site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MPJeff (talk • contribs) 07:50, 29 April 2011

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see several non-trivial (albeit not very detailed) secondary independent RS sources details various aspect of the Longano (personal and career). [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] etc. They scrape notability (he is not necessarily the subject of sources, but his related actions are) but I think he passed BIO. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources already available and those provided by Hellknowz. The new business didn't launch and still managed to generate some interest 1 2, and the coverage is extensive and very solid even when in most cases the articles' focus of interest is obviously the product/company he's involved with and not so much him - frankieMR (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I came here out of interest in knowing more. This was vital in my search. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.219.226.77 (talk) 21:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.