Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon Music Exclusive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Music Exclusive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no sources. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 05:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Time-filling promotional music videos for the network's musical artists with no notability beyond filling three minutes a Nestle's commercial couldn't. Definite Nickcruft. Nate • (chatter) 08:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too crufty, no independent notability as a stand-alone "product". Dennis Brown (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources to verify if this short is notable. Cutecutecuteface2000 (Questions, comments, complaints?) 16:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Gongshow ^Talk 17:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Gongshow ^Talk 17:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – After several searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Short videos that only show to help fill a time slot. Non-notable. SL93 (talk) 23:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.