Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Deschamps (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Deschamps (ice hockey)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject isn't notable - doesn't meet WP:NHOCKEY Dkchana (talk) 21:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'd say winning the Michel Bergeron Trophy is a claim to notability. Patken4 (talk) 20:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awards aren't part of NHOCKEY anymore. However, he is a mere 18 games away from meeting the requirements so its a bit of a ridiculous nomination in my view. -DJSasso (talk) 00:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awards not a part of NHOCKEY? That's only going to cause problems... Patken4 (talk) 01:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They were actually removed because of the problems they were causing where people kept debating what "major" meant when it came to awards. All that is left now is First All-Star Team member or Career Top 10 in scoring in the league and All-American. Anyone who wins most of the big awards are likely to also be on the First All-Star team so it won't change things for most people. But it stops those with minor awards like scholastic player of the year from having a claim. -DJSasso (talk)

If he got coverage in reliable sources for getting the trophy, though, does it really matter whether we think the award is notable or not? UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No as long as he meets the GNG then NHOCKEY goes out the window....I was just pointing out something in his comment since he likely hadn't seen the changes to the notability guideline. Just need to find reliable sources talking about him in significant detail. (and for more than just winning the award because if the only articles talking about him are about him winning the award that is a WP:BLP1E issue. -DJSasso (talk) 21:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.