Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night Guard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Night Guard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Not yet broadcast TV shows are seldom considered notable. Promotional tone. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment IMDb says it was broadcast in 2011 in South Africa, so it's not an unreleased series. There's coverage in South African media although not sure how high quality sources like these are:[1][2][3] It's a horrid, promotional article so I don't blame people too much for not doing WP:BEFORE, and WP:TNT may still apply. Unless someone wants to do a total rewrite. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – ref. #2 concerns a completely unrelated series. That leaves ref #1 which is IMDb, which itself cannot be used to demonstrate notability under WP:GNG. Therefore, the article is effectively unsourced. So no notability demonstrated + a promotional tone = delete. --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.