Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nine Hundred Nights (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 03:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nine Hundred Nights (film)

No notability. No sources or references, no press coverage - IMDB does not count (according to WP:NF). CultureDrone (talk) 11:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Notability established as shown here [1] and here [2]. As a side note to all editors, how about making a New Year resolution that before recommending a Keep or Delete, do a little research on the subject. I have seen extremely good and notable articles be deleted under WP:SNOW because no one took the time, just a few seconds, to verify. HAPPY NEW YEAR Shoessss | Chat 14:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Shoessss.--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I stand suitably chastised :-) CultureDrone (talk) 15:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator !voting "keep" -- I guess that counts as a withdrawn nomination. Should this be closed then? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Also a look at google news may be helpful, in future[3].--Aldux (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per nominator withdrawal and snow. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.