Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitcha Tengprawat Le

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nitcha Tengprawat Le

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching with her Thai name "ณิชชา เต็งประวัติ เล", I got only two sources in Google news. This biography currently don't meet notability as per WP:TOOSOON. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There're plenty of news references, but almost all of them are either coverage of her receiving the award,[1][2] or articles and interviews focusing on her company's products.[3][4][5] --Paul_012 (talk) 14:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn as Weak keep. --Marvellous Spider-Man 10:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The awards don't seem to be notable awards and some of the content is PR. In others, the subject is receiving a mention in context of her company (WP:NOTINHERITED). The quality of the sources leaves much to be desired as well and in any case, I don't see reliable sources about the subject herself. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I looked at the Thai Wikipedia and it seems the article was deleted there. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to the company article. Thinking of it, the subject doesn't appear to be independently notable. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.