Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No More Dead Dogs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, due to the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No More Dead Dogs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources for No More Dead Dogs. Fails WP:FICTION Schuym1 (talk) 03:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This book is notable, and is well known Yamakiri TC § 07-1-2008 • 04:34:40 04:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This leads me to assume that you have access to WP:reliable, published sources indepenant of the author and publishing company which can be used to WP:prove or verify the article contents and demonstrate that it passes the WP:notability inclusion guideline for books. Care to share? -- saberwyn 09:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete as copyvio of [1] and redirect to Gordon Korman. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete as above. Eusebeus (talk) 10:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete per Jasynnash. As noted, this is copied off of the website for the library in Portland, Oregon. I don't think I'm alone in having zero tolerance for plagiarism. Mandsford (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I deleted the copyvio material. Not much left. Deor (talk) 14:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and recreate later if sources are found. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and recreate later if sources are found per Anna Lincoln. No need to keep a "dangerous" page history like this around. – sgeureka t•c 18:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.