Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noodle Kidoodle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under G12. — ξ ^xplicit 19:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noodle Kidoodle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced and no indication notability. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be notable enough, with its history and number of locations. I have an issue with the general lack of sources. Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 05:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few references to the page Noodle Kidoodle. Don't remove it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cody5882300 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - work of a banned sock puppet, User:codyfinke --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 09:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.