Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Barry Cass
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd. North America1000 00:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Norman Barry Cass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete or possible Merge into Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd. Don't see the point of having a separate article, which has zero encyclopedic knowledge, when it is so heavily covered at Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd. Merge or Delete. scope_creep (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd, which is apparently the primary source of the person's notability. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd; WP:BLP1E. TJRC (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 12:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.