Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North New York, Bronx
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Mott Haven, Bronx. Sandstein 07:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- North New York, Bronx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Stub article that is total OR and unsourced, and has been that way for a breathtaking seven years. Google discloses only incidental mentions in real estate listings and the like. Should be deleted or merged with Mott Haven, Bronx. ScottyBerg (talk) 19:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes; merge it. There is a North New York Congregational Church; I may have a photo of it. Jim.henderson (talk) 19:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as suggested. Nomiker has not been used for almost 100 years. Bearian (talk) 20:51, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Searching through antiquarian books on Google I'm finding a bit on North New York, brief references insufficient for a separate article. Therefore I agree that a Merge with Mott Haven is the best outcome, though I guess that's tantamount to deletion since this article is only one paragraph. ScottyBerg (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - per above. Monterey Bay (talk) 02:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.