Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novosibirsk Specialized Music School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Novosibirsk Specialized Music School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable school failing the notability guideline for organizations and companies. It gets no hits on Google News archives or Google Books. The Russian translation (provided by Google Translate, of course, so correct me if the search term is wrong) also gets no hits on Google News archives or Google Books. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 22:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing any third-party sourcing or coverage to justify a self-standing article at this time. --DAJF (talk) 04:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per our usual practice with verifiable high/secondary schools. The Russian name is Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, for which there are a few Google News hits, and the Russian Wikipedia article cites a book published by a university press. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article does not have significant coverage in more than one secondary verified source to satisfy WP:GNG ZachFoutre (talk) 13:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)— ZachFoutre (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Struck per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birmingham Blue Coat School. Sorry, M. Ritzman. Uncle G (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I've added some references to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 12:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This source constitutes significant coverage of the topic [1]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per arguments cited by Phil Bridger. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 19:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.