Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music Vol. 70
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as G4. Nothing has changed since the original AfD and later recreations. I have protected the page and will unprotect if sourced, encyclopaedic material can be produced. However, any recreation would be better done under the original title for consistency. TerriersFan (talk) 04:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very little information. It possibly fails WP:CRYSTAL, depending on your point of view of that policy and the article in question. Article can be re-created once more information is known. My vote: Delete Speedy Delete after reading below comments. TheProf - T / C 23:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: already been through AFD twice as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 70 (U.K. series) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 70 (U.K. series) (2nd nomination), and both times snowball speedy closed for this very reason. This article only exists because the other title is protected; I'd propose protecting this too. Kinitawowi (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per first two AfD's. PC78 (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as recreated material. Protect this title too; as with the others can be recreated if and when a release occurs. I don't have the time or patience to look right now, but if the same editor(s) are recreating the articles, a warning is in order, too (or at least a friendly). 23skidoo (talk) 02:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as consensus can change and per this. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 03:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now, per the previous AfDs. NTWICM volumes 1-69 all have articles as well, so this should eventually; however, there's no citation as to its date of release. If there were, I'd say keep and tag as an upcoming album, but without it we can't be sure it will ever exist. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 04:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.