Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call R&B (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now That's What I Call R&B

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also including

Delete. Recreated over previous AFD (see link). Album and the other added this nom fail the notability requirements of WP:NALBUMS as they have received no coverage in independent reliable sources and should only need a mention on the discography page. Most Now albums released in the US will at least chart on Billboard or be reviewed by Allmusic. Neither of the albums nominated here, as exclusives to a single retailer, have even done that. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 16:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 17:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, (maybe G4 speedy delete?) The article continues to be at odds with the notability criteria at WP:NALBUMS, with no assertions the albums has charted or been reviewed. I'm not certain about this, but I think the article may speedily deleted per WP:G4 as a page recreated after a deletion discussion, as it was not created with the guidelines suggested by the closing admin: recreation as a redirect to some appropriate target. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 18:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.