Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numb to life
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect per consensus. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Numb to life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. Sources refer entirely to the drugs, and say nothing about the film. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Like TPH, I cannot see how WP:NFILM is met here. Various Google searches reveal that the general notability guideline is not met, either, although use of the phrase "numb to life" is apparently not uncommon. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 10:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect for now to Jason Cook (actor)#Career per WP:TOOSOON where now has a sourced mention. What we have is an unreleased film by a notable person yes, but that itself has no coverage. If this changes and it can meet WP:NF, then we might consider a return... but until then... nope. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: After asking the nominator for his opinion on a redirect,[1] he stated "Yeah, go ahead and redirect." Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball Watcher 22:21, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I can't find enough coverage of the film to justify an article yet. Qrsdogg (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.