Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurtuan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by JamesBWatson. --BDD (talk) 22:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nurtuan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- WP-GNG - Not notable
- WP:SPAM/WP:PROMO - Article created by sockpuppet of banned spammer Voidz.
Note that the prod was removed by an SPA... Also probably linked to the pile of banned socks. PeterWesco (talk) 23:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There is no coverage in reliable sources. He hasn't actually released anything. Sources consist solely of unreliable self-promotiojn like this. -- Whpq (talk) 13:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable sources. Also, the article was created by a banned sockpuppet. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.