Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyan Boateng
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 02:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nyan Boateng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unclear notability as a college player and non-present sources about his pro career seem limited to off the field issues. Can't see that he passes any of the sport specific notability guidelines nor GNG. StarM 22:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. StarM 22:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. StarM 22:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. StarM 22:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 01:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 01:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep appears to pass WP:GNG based on the sources I've added to the article. San Francisco Chronicle, Sports Illustrated, New York Daily News, The Miami Herald with featured articles on the subject. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY. The newly added sources are sufficient to meet the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.