Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OPALS-NA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted. Speedily deleted due to copyright violation (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OPALS-NA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic may be notable, but this article here is a hopeless attempt. Nothing here but promotional buzzwords, attempts to ride the coattails of others' notability, and not-independently-verified claims of size of userbase; only edits to it are the hit&run creation by username matching product that has made no other edits on WP. If this were new, might have even gone CSD G11. DMacks (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Spammy article created by (and the only editor) by a single purpose account. Largely a copy and paste of press releases from this company, see http://www.opals-na.org/pdf/OPALS%20Newsletter%20November%202006.pdf and http://help.opalsinfo.net/?page_id=479 RadioFan (talk) 13:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.