Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oblique lumbar lateral interbody fusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G120 by Anthony Bradbury.. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 15:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oblique lumbar lateral interbody fusion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A neologism about a surgical procedure that doesn't meet the general notability guideline. The article appears to have been written by the doctor who developed it raising WP:OR concerns. SmartSE (talk) 21:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are 7 primary sources on this per pubmed and no reviews. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This item is already well placed on Spinal fusion page. A little of the page info could be added to there. This procedure does not warrant its own page. The paragraph on the economics is totally unnecessary.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note The article has been deleted as a copyright violation, but I'm not sure where it is copied from. I've asked User:Anthony Bradbury for more details, but in the meantime, can we keep this open? SmartSE (talk) 16:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.