Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohio State University stabbing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep Fuzheado | Talk 19:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Ohio State University attack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only a few injuries, no deaths (aside from the gunman), suspect identified and killed , does not seem worthy of having a standalone article. If something is to happen to the article, it should be redirected to List of school shootings in the United States Andise1 (talk) 18:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and suggest withdrawal. First of all, you're asking this to be redirected in an AfD. Also, there is currently a merge discussion open. I see no valid reason given for this. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 18:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at this time. Premature; there is no deadline. Investigation has barely started. General Ization ^Talk 18:34, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SNOW Keep. Being covered by the major national media as a significant event. If it turns out that it was caused by a bad breakup. We can revisit. But keep at least for now because that AFD makes Wikipedia look stupid.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep G0T0 (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per WP:COMMONSENSE. --143.105.17.185 (talk) 18:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Come on. The attacker hasn't even been identified yet. —Мандичка^YO 😜 18:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep and come back in a month or so if it there are still concerns. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Strongly support keeping this article as a significant event. Juneau Mike (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Not a strong basis for a deletion. 'Few injuries, little known attacker'. Can easily be compared to the Chelsea Bombings in Manhattan. Recommend a keep. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 18:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly urge the next editor coming to this page to CLOSE this discussion. We can always revisit after the dust settles.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, the next editor coming to this page says delete per WP:NOT#NEWS. How can something that happened a few hours ago have possibly attracted coverage in the secondary sources that this encyclopedia is supposed to be based on? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should look at the cited sources for the article to confirm that it did. General Ization ^Talk 19:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.