Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oksana Kolesnikova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oksana Kolesnikova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional intent and no underlying notability.I and others did some fairly extensive cleanup, but there is not enough left. None of the recordings seem to have won awards or critical comment. The NYT reference might seem significant--but click on it--it a single photo of here with somebody else as one of a series of photographs. Despite the claim in the article here, she has not "been written about in The New York Times". Nothing else is substantial enough Nor is someone notable for being incorrectly referred to as a famous person's girlfriend. DGG ( talk ) 14:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- does not meet WP:NMUSIC & significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Being mistaken for Oksana Grigorieva is not a notable achievement. This is apparently undisclosed paid editing, which is against our terms of use; while we do not yet have a policy which mandates deletion of such pages, we have plenty of precedent for doing so, notably in the Orangemoody clean-up. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.