Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olarinde Olayemi Ayanfeoluwa
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily Deleted by DGG. (non-admin closure) James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 13:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Olarinde Olayemi Ayanfeoluwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. In the references provided, one of them is a tweet from twitter and the other shows her being nominated for a non notable award. A BEFORE I conducted shows no evidence of notability. Celestina007 (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- delete this is actual promotional gibberish. Praxidicae (talk) 12:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete for insufficient notability, insufficient sources found.NotButtigieg (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per G11 Promotional is an understatement. It is irrecoverably down the drain, and G11 is the only option. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 15:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not meet criteria for WP:NARTIST. An online search brought up social media hits and insignificant coverage, definitely not enough to establish notability. Netherzone (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not for promotion. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 07:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.