Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OldApps
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 14:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- OldApps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no indication why subject is important to be included and non reliable third party sources. Itsalleasy (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - I fixed the nom and am neutral. Ansh666 21:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 30. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 19:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete All of the sources are from directories with no indication of notability. Admiral Caius (talk) 21:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 12:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 11:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.