Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Al Ashi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Al Ashi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

paid for vanity spam sourced to mostly blackhat SEO, interviews and press releases. YODADICAE👽 12:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, I've long thought that a tracking category for new bios that mention the word entrepreneur might be a worthwhile idea... AngryHarpy‍^talk 06:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate your help and ideas. But it's not a spam, or anything. It's just a bio of a living person that needs to be on Wikipedia, because of the unique idea and project and the awards he has received. Let's all just take our time to read what it's about and appreciate to do something better for the community. I'd really appreciate your help. EdwardMill (talk) 07:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete immediately, obvious vanity article and subject is not notable by any standards. The sources linked are not reputable at all. Also, are we going to ignore that the editor's bio is copied from an account that was banned for being a sock puppet? http://wikipedia.us.nina.az/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1019030755 Transfo47 (talk) 18:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC) [reply]
Delete — The sources used in the article barely expressly make reference to him and that in itself is a major red flag. A before search confirmed my suspicion that they weren’t notable. Celestina007 (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would note that the editor has changed their bio from the sockpuppet account's text. https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:EdwardMill&type=revision&diff=1025622283&oldid=1025393993&diffmode=visual Transfo47 (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, promotional and not needed.--Geshem Bracha (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.