Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmegaRed
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete - blanked by author. ... discospinster talk 23:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OmegaRed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:MUSIC. Additionally, article written by subject, so large conflict of interest. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree that it appears that way to me as well. Although the artist is in the mix and has received newspaper publicity (article in the Boston Globe) and award(s), there is a question as to who wrote the article and the motivation for writing it. If it's the artist himself who wrote the article on himself, then there's a conundrum in Wikipedia ethical terms. Notability is another general issue which is harder to resolve and weigh out. --- (Bob)
In the Dorchester, Massachusetts article, Robert Grant (or the person with the editor tag "User:Robertgrant1976") appears to have added himself as a notable person from Dorchester. Does this follow the same guidelines ? --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiklrsc (talk) 01:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: lacks widespread reliable 3rd party coverage WP:MUSICBIO. JamesBurns (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Jclemens (talk) 06:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC, no third party coverage. — neuro(talk) 08:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I searched Google and couldn't find any independent coverage of this musician's work. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.