Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ong Kean Swan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g11, blatant advertising. Although I agree with Bejnar that an article should be written about Mr. Ong as a scam artist, the current copy is all self-promotion and arguably misleading. Anyone should feel free to start a neutral article. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ong Kean Swan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references. Removal of CSD and BLPPROD templates ASCII-002 I NotifyOnline 15:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Clear copyright infringement and the author has repeatedly removed the CSD templates without addressing the issue. Piguy101 (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Should Garydog be reported to the sysops for blocking because of her/his poor behavior in articles and lack of discussing the problems at hand? Piguy101 (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- I looked at the similarities between the source material and the article/stub, and there are enough differences that I declined the speedy deletion (for that reason of copyvio only). That having been said, this person can not in any way be said to be notable. Delete. FWIW, I am warning the noob once more. Bearian (talk) 15:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Leaving the author's behaviour aside... Not notable, looks like an advert and possible COI. --Stroppolotalk 15:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Not notable and looks like a resumé - not to mention the removal of templates by Garydog. DJAMP4444 (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete seriously. WP:SNOW, creator WP:NOTHERE. Widefox; talk 00:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Keep and rewrite extensively. This scam artist takes money from investors and gambles with it using "his system". "此通告的目的:圆梦集团负责人的PETER ONG和PHILIP ONG经常到处演讲". Baccarat Institute. He was arrested in 2013 for impersonating Perak royalty. Earlier he was a distributor for Melilea, a company selling health and beauty products, and provided confidential information on their "sharp" business practices to the newspapers. Melilea lost its 2007 defamation suit against the newspapers but won against him and other distributors. Coverage includes:
- "#01: 'Tengku Ong' Didakwa Di Mahkamah". Crime Watch. 22 March 2013. his arrest with photos
- "'Tengku Ong' mengaku tidak bersalah menyamar kerabat diraja". Astro Awani. 20 March 2013. arrest with photos
- "Ahli perniagaan Cina menyamar kerabat diraja Perak didakwa". Kosmo! Online. 20 March 2013. arrest
- "Spreading birthday joy by giving". The Star Online. 8 November 2013. with photo
- "Firm loses lawsuit against Kayveas and three others". The Star Online. 28 May 2012.
- "Company loses suit against NSTP". New Straits Times. 28 May 2012.
- "Saman fitnah RM20 juta syarikat jualan lansung terhadap Kayveas ditolak". Sinar Harian. 27 March 2012.
I did not find coverage of his insurance business or coffee business. --Bejnar (talk) 20:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.