Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open API

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) IagoQnsi (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above closer had somehow messed the close up so I've reverted and reclosed, Hopefully that's fixed it. –Davey2010^Talk 01:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Open API

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is written more like an opinion piece than an encyclopedia article, and it has been for a very long time (the essay-like tag has been there for over seven years ). An "Open API" isn't really a standalone topic; it's just a Web 2.0 buzzword (WP:NOTDIC) about making APIs public. I would suggest this article be merged into Open data, but I don't think there's any content here that could be merged without having to be substantially revised or rewritten due to the unencyclopedic tone. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep while wording should be corrected - article itself covers fairly notable subject with quite substantial amount of links leading to it. SkywalkerPL (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. OpenAPI is very different from OpenData, and deserves an article of its own. E.g. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/open-api-policy.pdf http://nuviun.com/content/its-about-time-open-apis-finally-burst-onto-healthcares-sluggish-scene Ross-c (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep distinct subject, worthy of encyclopdic coverage. Artw (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep There are a number of sources about the idea and it appears that it's more of that, and idea, than a product. The first 50 Google hits make that clear. The problem is that the term is generic and several links do not discuss the concept. The article needs to be rewritten if it's kept. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.